Just a few points about the philosophical content. For example, liberals tend to see white collar criminals who want an extra million dollars as more morally blameworthy than regular criminals who rob convenience stores for a few hundred dollars. This is on the grounds that the white collar folks generally have been taught to do better, and therefore ought to do better; whereas the stockingheads have not been brought up in the way they should go and therefore deserve some slack.
Jehovah's Witness jstan said: So, faith is belief without evidence.
To me, faith sounds foolish: Yet, so many people in our society treat faith as a virtue and pronounce their faith proudly. Why is faith not seen as foolish and worthy or ridicule? What possible reason is there to see belief without evidence as a good thing? I know this may sound like a question asked simply to stir up trouble, but I mean it sincerely -- I'm really trying to understand this.
The biblical definition of faith is explained here: The Scriptures tell us: This term is common in ancient papyrus business documents. It conveys the idea of something that underlies visible conditions and guarantees a future possession.
In view of this, Moulton and Milligan suggest the rendering: Thereby this evidence makes clear what has not been discerned before and so refutes what has only appeared to be the case.
Faith is, therefore, the basis for hope and the evidence for conviction concerning unseen realities Insight on the scriptures. So faith really is based on evidence according to the scriptural idea of faith.5 days ago · At the time, there was a segment of the program looking at values, yet barely any research into why — or even whether — values matter.
Ten years on, the landscape has changed dramatically and the importance of establishing a strong Values Hierarchy — as it is known — is well established.
In particular Ted insists (elsewhere in Chamberlain's book) that moral values are truths that are similar to mathematical and logical truths But this seems to go against the facts that there can be persisting serious moral disagreements among cultures and individuals.
Start studying Excelsior Ethics.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Nineteenth-century philosopher who believed that God did not exist and that there were no objective ethical values built into the fabric of the universe.
or arbitrary bias, for members of one's own species and against. Are some ethical values or principles relative to one's own culture, religion or personal opinion?
|law | The Business Ethics Blog | Page 2||Varieties of Moral Skepticism Moral skeptics differ in many ways, but they share a common core that makes them all moral skeptics. What makes moral skepticism moral is that it concerns morality rather than other topics.|
|HAVEN`T FOUND FREE ESSAY YOU WANT? WE'LL WRITE||The Fall of the Hippocratic Oath: Introduction Medicine as a profession demands of physicians extraordinary moral sensitivity as they respond to patient vulnerability Pellegrino, c; Pellegrino,|
Are some ethical values not culturally relevant? What. Morality is your personal code that is a negotiation between you and others (and I do believe/suspect there are some 'objective' moral wrongs on the distinct definition of morality, there are also clearly relative morals, and more accurately morality is a constraint problem where there are sometimes only poor solutions).
Why should financial services organisations try to be ethical?
There have been numerous arguments for and against this topic. 5% of the respondents believe is just relevant. One erson apiece, representing 2% believe that it is irrelevant and completely irrelevant.
Table 23 75% of the respondents say that incomplete compliant testing is.